Research project led by Bailey Hanna, MS, RDN - no affiliate links, ads or sponsored products.
One study assessed the effects of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis UABla-12 on various IBS symptoms and quality of life over a 42-day period. The main areas of focus were bowel habits, abdominal pain, abdominal distention, global IBS symptoms, and overall quality of life (QoL).
Key Findings:
Key Takeaways:
The probiotic B. lactis UABia-12 shows promise as a therapeutic option for managing IBS symptoms. Beneficial effect sizes were observed for bowel habits, abdominal pain, abdominal distention, and IBS Symptom Severity scores, suggesting a small to moderate clinical benefit. These findings indicate that B. lactis UABia-12 may be helpful for IBS symptom management. Further research is recommended to confirm these results.
Dosing Instructions:
Trial Duration
References:
Martoni CJ, Srivastava S, Leyer GJ. Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium lactis UAB1a-12 improve abdominal pain severity and symptomology in irritable bowel syndrome: Randomized controlled trial. Nutrients 2020;12:363. [doi: 10.3390/nu12020363
Evaluate products based on whether they transparently disclose all ingredients and their amounts, exclusively use probiotics tested in randomized placebo-controlled trials in IBS populations, and contain studied doses.
This probiotic has higher quality studies in IBS populations supporting it. View our evidence evaluation framework to learn how we assess the quality of studies.
Add condition
Lactobacillus acidophilus DDS-1 and Bifidobacterium lactis UAB1a-12 improve abdominal pain severity and symptomology in irritable bowel syndrome: Randomized controlled trial
Nutrients 2020;12:363
ADULTS
No subtype specific statistical analysis was conducted. At baseline, n=21 (19.1%) of participants in the UABIa-12 group were classified as having diarrhea (a type 6 or 7 stool form on the Bristol stool scale).
By the end of treatment, n=12 (10.9%) of participants were classified as having constipation. This was a 42.9%% relative mean reduction in participants experiencing diarrhea from baseline till the end of treatment. This was a 55.1% relative therapeutic gain over the placebo group.
No subtype specific statistical analysis was conducted. At baseline, n=22 (20%) of participants in the UABIa-12 group were classified as having constipation (a type 1 or 2 stool form on the bristol stool scale).
By the end of treatment, n=10 (9.1%) of participants were classified as having constipation. This was a 54.5% relative reduction in participants experiencing constipation from baseline till the end of treatment.
This was a 66.7% relative mean therapeutic gain over the placebo group, which experienced a higher occurrence of constipation by the end of treatment relative to baseline measurements.
Bowel habits were assessed using the IBS-SSS. The UABia-12 group experienced a mean absolute symptom score reduction of 17.86 points (a 28.3% relative reduction from baseline), which was statistically significant compared to placebo (p=0.001) by day 42 of the intervention.
The mean relative therapeutic gain over placebo was 15.1%. At baseline, 39.1% (43 out of 110) of participants in the UABia-12 group experienced abnormal stool forms (types 1, 2, 6, and 7 on the Bristol Stool Scale).
By day 42, 75.5% (83 out of 105) of participants in the UABia-12 group had normal stool forms, while only 20% (22 out of 105) continued to have abnormal stool forms. This represented a 23.9% relative increase in participants with normal stool forms and a 48.8% reduction in those with abnormal stool forms from baseline.
The relative therapeutic gain over placebo for reducing abnormal stool forms was 49%. Changes in bowel habits between the UABia-12 and placebo groups were statistically significant (p=0.022) by day 42.
We calculated an effect size of 0.43 for this parameter, which falls within our lowest effect size range. There were no statistically significant changes in stool frequency in the UABia-12 group.
The UABIa-12 group had baseline mean IBS-SSS scores of 305.45, which improved by a 104.5 point reduction, exceeding the MCID for this validated measurement tool. This effect was statistically significant compared to placebo by day 42 (p<0.001).
The mean relative decrease in IBS-SSS total score was 34.2%. Relative mean therapeutic gain over placebo was 5.4%.
We calculated an effect size of 0.53 for this parameter, placing it within our moderate effect size range.
Based on abdominal pain severity scores from the APS-NRS, the B.lactis UABIa-12 group had 28.2% of participants classified as abdominal pain responders by day 42, meaning they had a >30% reduction in abdominal pain severity (p=0.031). The therapeutic gain over placebo was 12.6%.
We calculated an effect size of 0.43 for this parameter which falls within our lowest effect size range.
Results from another screening tool used in the study called the IBS symptom severity score (IBS-SSS) also revealed significant benefits for abdominal pain severity and duration compared to the placebo group for the UABla-12 probiotic group.
For the abdominal pain severity parameter, there was a mean absolute reduction of 24.35 points (-37.3%) from baseline by day 42. This was statistically significant compared to placebo (p<0.001) and the UABIa-12 group had a mean therapeutic gain over placebo of 17.3%.
For abdominal pain duration, the UABla-12 group had an absolute mean reduction of 20.95 points (36.4%) by day 42 that was statistically significant compared to placebo (p<0.001). The mean therapeutic gain over placebo in the UABIa-12 group was 21.1%.
Abdominal distention was assessed using the IBS-SSS. The UABIa-12 group experienced a mean absolute symptom score reduction of 21.90 points (37.0%), which was statistically significant compared to placebo (p<0.034). The mean relative therapeutic gain over placebo was 10.5%.
We calculated an effect size of 0.26 for this parameter, placing it within our lowest effect size range.
No data
In participants taking B. lactis UABla-12, despite intragroup improvement in IBS-QoL, no significant differences were observed when compared to placebo.
Additionally, a significant effect was observed between B. lactis UABla-12 and placebo on the perceived stress scale (PSS) at day 21 (p = 0.030), however, no difference was observed at the end of study visit.
For the QOL measure on the IBS-SSS tool, the UABIa-12 group experienced a statistically significant mean relative improvement of 31.7% from baseline till day 42 (p=0.001). Therapeutic gain over placebo was 13.8%.